I wonder what would be the reaction of the millions of recreational players currently limiting their Pencetpoker play to home games, if the cost to play was reduced to, say, $ 15 per hour, or less. I would venture to say many of them will be visiting their local casino more often. That will help the poker industry to grow and develop, which is Robert’s goal.
Casinos will fill their empty tables with more seniors, making up for lower rakes. That may be a problem, especially in the mornings and afternoons during the five working days each week when young players (must be 21 or over to play at most casinos) who are working for a living are at their jobs and unavailable.
Sounds like win-win to me. And while we’re at it, what would happen if the casino offered tournaments with lower entry and entry fees? How many more recreational poker players are rushing to the casino? And, what about tournaments for senior citizens only, designed with provisions to reduce pressure on older players making them less stressful and more enjoyable?
Hold the work day, starting with a buffet lunch just before noon. Casinos can even offer free bus rides from the senior center. It would be quite an experience – something older recreational players look forward to. Quite a few members of Claude Pepper Seniors’ Poker Group – all recreational players who love the game – have taken the opportunity, at times, to play at the local casino. These are retirees who often live off regular income, especially social security, pensions, and savings. $ 150 or maybe as much as $ 180 for a six hour session, more than they could afford. Indeed, most come home losers.
10 top site :